DMCA – Tech Creak us digital millennium copyright act search engine

Tech Creak

Tech Creak

DMCA

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a United States copyright law that implements two 1996 treaties of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

For Any DMCA Notice Please Contact Us : alikhanjatoi8@gmail.com

Follow:

SEARCH RECENT POSTS Advantages of Digital Marketing How Can Email Marketing Help My Business? 7 Wonders Of Using Webinars For Your Business Why You Need SEO Services for Online Business Choosing The Top Web Hosting PAGES ABOUT US CONTACT US DMCA CATEGORIES Email Marketing Internet M ailjxwyn. saks moncler mokaarketing Search Engine Marketing SEO Web Hosting AMUNG US

Tech Creak © 2017. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by WordPress. Theme by Press Customizr.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Ok
us digital millennium copyright act search engine

complaint letter
Discount Moncler on sale
moncler milano outlet address
moncler usa president
moncler mens boots sale Coin Center to Congress: Give Blockchain Developers "Safe Harbor" June 10, 2017, 09:27:08 AM EDT By Brandon Green, Bitcoin Magazine Shutterstock photo

Coin Center was invited to present testimony on Thursday to both the House Subcommittee on Digital Commerce and Consumer Protection and the House Subcommittee on Terrorism and Illicit Finance. They explained to both subcommittees the role that digital assets play in the world, what the future of the sector may look like, and how regulators could interact with the sector in a way that protects both the consumers and the innovators and encourages businesses in the industry to reside in America.

Peter Van Valkenburgh, director of research at Coin Center, spoke to the House Subcommittee on Digital Commerce and Consumer Protection. He explained to the subcommittee the revolutionary role blockchain technology is playing in the world around us. "Just as the PC democratized computing, and the web democratized news and entertainment, open blockchain networks are democratizing financial services."

Van Valkenburgh, however, drew a stark contrast between the regulatory safe harbors given to early internet innovators, specifically the Communications Decency Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and what little is being done to protect blockchain technology innovators today.

"Both laws created safe harbors for infrastructure-building businesses," noted Van Valkenburgh. The laws protected the creators of the internet's infrastructure from third-party liability stemming from the users of that infrastructure.

In a conversation with Bitcoin Magazine , Van Valkenburgh gave the example of Google. Google isn't liable for a user who illegally downloads pirated material from a website whose link popped up on their search engine. This is because of the aforementioned Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which provided a safe harbor and allowed Google to continue to build the infrastructure of the internet (in this case, a search engine) free from crushing copyright liabilities.

A similar distinction should be drawn when it comes to regulating innovators in blockchain technology, Van Valkenburgh noted in the conversation. There are two main entities innovating in the space: custodians who hold the valuable digital assets for consumers, and developers who are building the infrastructure of blockchain technology, but who don't hold consumer funds. "These very different entities," said Van Valkenburgh, "should be regulated in very different ways."

An example of a "custodian" would be Coinbase, who regularly holds a consumer's bitcoin, ether or other digital assets. An infrastructure developer would be more like a software wallet developer, who simply creates a tool with which a consumer can interact with the blockchain, safekeep their own digital assets and send transactions. The wallet developers themselves don't exercise any control over their users' digital assets.

The infrastructure developers, Van Valkenburgh points out, should not then be regulated as money transmitters who must get licensed state by state before starting their business. Their role is just to create portals and pipelines through which the transactions can flow, not to direct or control the transactions themselves. If the developer were found to be misleading the consumer with his/her software product, then ex-post-regulatory punishment may be appropriate, but again, there should not have to be a permission process that precedes these developers' endeavors.

When it comes to the custodial financial services, much of the regulation, and therefore protection for innovators, is at the state level. This makes it complicated for innovators to be based in the U.S. because of the plethora of different regulators in the space. Each regulator has the ability to affect how an innovator in blockchain technology operates.

Van Valkenburgh said in his statement to the subcommittee, "In order to reestablish the U.S. as a leader we need to rationalize the chaos of financial services regulation, starting with state-by-state money transmission licensing."

These custodial services, the ones holding a consumer's value, should be regulated, argues Van Valkenburgh, but they should not have to repeat a licensing process 50 or more times over. Because of that costly barrier to entry, someone innovating in the space today would be best-advised to leave the U.S. and start their business in a country with simpler regulatory structures. We must regulate at the federal level if we want a simpler licensing process.

Bitcoin and Terrorist Financing

On the same day, Jerry Brito, executive director of Coin Center, joined a panel to discuss with the United States House of Representatives Subcommittee on Terrorism and Illicit Finance any national security implications of these financial innovations.

Brito explained to the subcommittee, "[Bitcoin] is open to bad actors who take advantage of it. Criminals certainly use it today, and we have begun to see some nascent interest from terrorist groups. According to a recent report on the potential of terrorist use of digital currencies by the Center for a New American Security, however, 'Currently there is no more than anecdotal evidence that terrorist groups have used virtual currencies to support themselves.'"

Brito views the infancy of interest by these bad groups as an opportunity to get in front of the problem. "This means there is time to develop an appropriate response to the possibility; a reasoned response that targets the threat while preserving the freedom to innovate."

The main take-home message from this meeting, however, was that, as Van Valkenburgh explained in his conversation with Bitcoin Magazine , there doesn't actually appear to be much use of digital currency in the funding of terrorism. In fact, it is a bit unwieldy for terrorists to use because of the public nature of the distributed ledger. However, this shouldn't stop the U.S. from developing solutions to curb the use of digital currencies by terrorists.

What Coin Center wanted these subcommittees to understand, at the end of the day, is that digital currency is here to stay. It cannot be destroyed. The technology is neither bad nor good, but instead is a new tool at the disposal of anyone with a computer. To ignore the technology is to allow other countries to take the lead in adopting and incorporating it, and gaining the benefits of it in the process.

Beginning the process of effectively and sensibly regulating digital currency is a must if the government wants to derive any benefits from its existence and prevalence.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.

This article appears in: Bitcoin display"> More from Bitcoin Magazine Subscribe Bitcoin Magazine Distributed yBitcoin Related Bitcoin Articles Subscribe Russia's Crypto-Winter Shows Signs of a Thaw in Saint Petersburg 6/27/2017 04:50 PM FBI: Hackers Extorted $28 Million in Cryptocurrencies Last Year 6/27/2017 01:51 PM Bitcoin Price Analysis: Bear Run Shows No Decrease in Momentum 6/26/2017 06:50 PM

© 1999-2015 Peak Positions, LLC | 400 E. 8th St. | Traverse City, Michigan (MI) USA 49686

Tel: 231-922-9460 | Fax: 231-929-3398 | Email Us

Home Search Engine Optimization Company Search Marketing Company Organic Website Optimization Natural Website Optimization Google SEO SEO News Organic Optimization Google Search Engine Optimization Search Engine Placement SEO Specialists Organic Search Marketing SEO Consulting Testimonials SEO Blog SEO Site Map

Organic SEO Company Peak Positions Legal Disclosure: For the purposes of this organic search engine optimization published guideline and website policy posting, the term organic optimization "Proprietary Information" shall mean organic search engine optimization or organic SEO as all programs, trade secrets, W3C HTML code compositions, dynamic site optimization procedures, inventions, techniques, vendor relationships, advertising agency partnerships, strategic alliances, and venture capital arrangements. Our Organic SEO Company provides proven organic search engine optimization solutions in what many parties consider as the most competitive marketing and advertising sector in the world. As an organic SEO company the client domains and URLs we optimize are deemed confidential and privileged, belonging to and for the exclusive sole benefit of our clients. Peak Positions SEO Company Internet Publishing and Organic Search Engine Optimization Legal Copyright Statement is as follows: Our organic SEO company corporate attorneys in compliance with the Digital Millennium Act of 1995, The Lanham Act, and the established electronic publishing ownership copyright laws of ICANN (www.icann.org), also in compliance with the UK Patent Office 2001 Internet Copyright Legislation have worked together in publishing this organic search engine optimization disclaimer. New Internet Marketing laws have been introduced over the last 12 years giving legal protection to the right of our organic SEO firm in the digital environment; in 1996, the world intellectual property organization (WIPO) treaty made a move toward intellectual legislation leading to the following laws and amendments to be passed: the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA, 1998) in the United States, in the European Directive 2001/29/EC in Europe, which requires member states to implement the changes to their own internet publishing legislation as a result of materials, images, text, content, technology, trademarks, patents, service marks and copyrights partly because of their abstract nature can appear as just a bundle, but are protected with invisible rights. Intellectual property rights are complicated and it is easier to pretend that they do not exist and ignore them rather than try to abide by and comprehend them. Organic SEO Company Peak Positions, LLC of Traverse City, Michigan and our corporate attorneys understand that ignorance of our organic SEO company policies and natural search engine optimization services does not provide protection under the established laws. This organic search engine optimization and organic SEO company website is in compliance with new international legislation regarding copyrights and intellectual property rights and are posting this natural optimization legal disclaimer statement in an effort to better control and manage third party interaction with this website. Any duplication, reproduction or unauthorized use of any part of this organic SEO company website, its images, contents, format, designs, etc., without the express written consent of Organic SEO Company Peak Positions including the use of Peer-to-Peer network software that allows the sharing of unlicensed copies of the organic search engine optimization content published within is breaking the law and strictly forbidden by Peak Positions, LLC of Traverse City, Michigan (USA). Peak Positions SEO Traverse City, Michigan provides organic search engine optimization; the process of targeting keyword search phrases related to a website, and ensuring that corporate website properties are listed at the top of the organic search results pages when corresponding target keyword phrases are included as part of an Internet keyword search or organic keyword search query. All written organic search engine optimization materials, press releases, newspaper articles, contained herein of any nature whatsoever are subject to our organic SEO company copyright and trademark protection and shall remain the exclusive property of our Traverse City SEO company and be deemed as that by terms used in the United States Copyright Law, 17 U.S.C. Section 101, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, and the Lanham Act. This Governing Law of Intellectual Property rights protection and organic SEO policies published on this organic search engine optimization company and natural search engine optimization firm website shall be construed and enforced pursuant to the digital copyright laws of the State of Michigan. Our Organic Search Engine Optimization company clients understand that the major search engines and directories are complex and that our proven Organic SEO company programs typically require time, unique skills, and highly specialized organic search engine optimization services required to secure and maintain prominent keyword positions on the organic search results pages of: Google, Yahoo, Bing, DMOZ.org, Ask and more.

Our Organic SEO company educates and informs all clients making them well aware that only the major search engines themselves can assure website and or URL inclusion within any search engine database. In addition, the search engines are solely responsible for all keyword rankings, or specific keyword positions on the search engine results pages. Peak Positions SEO does not make any disingenuous claims, bold promises, or false guarantees that any specific domain or URL that incorporates our exclusive organic search engine optimization processes and proven SEO techniques will instantly and magically receive top five keyword positions in the user-preferred natural/organic search results pages of: Google, Yahoo, Bing, Ask.com, DMOZ.org or any major search engine, in thirty days or less. Our proven organic search engine optimization procedures are not guaranteed to deliver any specific keyword position in the natural search results or to attain any specific keyword position in the organic search results within any designated period of time, following upload and implementation. Every website is unique and is treated as such by the pre-programmed, automated search bots, crawlers and robot spiders that control any meaningful organic keyword search positions. URL acceptance levels and organic search placement capabilities can be greatly impacted by several factors, and working to gain an understanding of the collective algorithm parameters being utilized by the major search engine spiders that control organic keyword search results is vitally important if not critical to SEO success. Peak Positions LLC appreciates your consideration of our organic SEO company and proven natural search engine optimization programs and invites you to contact our organic search engine optimization technical team directly by email at: info@peakpositions.com or by telephone at: 231-922-9460.